Our office will remain closed through Friday, September 18th as we continue to assess the damages caused by Hurricane Sally. ActiGraph team members are working remotely, however shipping delays should be expected at this time. We expect to resume regular business hours on Monday, September 21st. If you need immediate assistance, please contact us by email at email@example.com and we will respond as quickly as possible. Thank you for your continued support.
Technical Reliability and Validity of the CSA Accelerometer: Should We Recalibrate or Re-Think?
- Published on 05/2003
Purpose To study the mica- and inter-instrument reliability and validity of the Computer Science & Applications (CSA) Model 7164 accelerometer, along with the nature of the analogue filter in the device with sinusoidal movements in a mechanical setting.
Methods Six CSA units were tested with 17 different frequencies (0.5-4Hz) on three radius settings (0.022-0.049m), yielding 51 different acceleration settings (0.1-19.7 rrvs-2).
Results Intra-instrument reliability was relatively good (mean CV of 4.4%), although questionable on extreme values of acceleration (<1ms-2 and >16ms-2). Analyses on inter-instrument reliability revealed both overall systematic bias and acceleration- specific differences between units, approaching unit error magnitudes of 20% from the mean of all 6 units. The correlation between CSA output and acceleration (Le., validity) was significant but the relationship was clearly nonlinear. Applying equations to cancel the frequency-dependent filtering restored this linearity (r2 = 0.97).
Conclusion The CSA exhibits reasonable intra-instrument reliability but large unit differences call for unit-specific calibration or alternatively statistical adjustment. Linearity between CSA output and acceleration is achieved only by correcting for movement frequency filtering.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise