Our office will remain closed through Friday, September 18th as we continue to assess the damages caused by Hurricane Sally. ActiGraph team members are working remotely, however shipping delays should be expected at this time. We expect to resume regular business hours on Monday, September 21st. If you need immediate assistance, please contact us by email at firstname.lastname@example.org and we will respond as quickly as possible. Thank you for your continued support.
Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines Does Not Result In Less Sedentary Time
- Presented on May 29, 2014
Background: Physical activity (PA) has long been associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. More recently, time spent in sedentary behaviours has emerged as an independent risk factor for all-cause and CVD mortality. It is not well known if meeting PA guidelines reduces the amount of time spent in sedentary behaviours.
Purpose: To determine if meeting PA guidelines is associated with less time spent daily in sedentary behaviours.
Methods: Subjects (n=84; age 45.5±20.5 yr, BMI 24.9±4.5 kg/m2) wore an initialised (60Hz) ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer, positioned at their right hip, for a minimum of 4 days with 10 hours valid wear-time per day. Raw accelerometry data were processed in ActiLife v6.8.0 using a 60s epoch. Cutpoints developed by Freedson et al. (1998) were used with uniaxial accelerometer data for the determination of sedentary time (9642 cpm]). MVPA was determined by summing the daily minutes in moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous over one week. Relative time spent in sedentary behaviour was calculated as a percentage of the total valid wear-time. Subjects were classiﬁed as active or inactive based on the criteria of accumulating >150 minutes/week of MVPA, or >75 minutes/week of vigorous PA, in >10 minute bouts. Relative (%) and absolute (minutes) sedentary time were compared between PA classiﬁcations (active or inactive) using independent samples t-tests, with signiﬁcance set at p<0.05.
Results: There were no signiﬁcant differences between active and inactive subjects for relative (64% vs. 63%, p>0.05) or absolute (517±77 vs. 527±99 minutes, p>0.05) time spent in sedentary behaviours.
Conclusions: The results indicate that active and inactive subjects spent a similar length of time in sedentary behaviours. Studies looking at the prevalence of the population meeting PA guidelines should consider sedentary behaviour analysis in order to give a broader context to the understanding of activity-related risk factors among the general population.